Current Screening Methods

Cervical cancer develops from slowly progressing intraepithelial lesions. If early changes in cervical cells are detected through screening programmes, cervical cancer is curable.

TruScreen cervical screening

Countries with effective screening programmes have a significantly reduced burden of cervical cancer. However, if undetected until late in its clinical course, it has a high death rate.

Screening programmes involve the testing of an asymptomatic “health” population. The primary goal of cervical screening is to detect pre-invasive cancers and prevent death from cervical cancer by treating pre-cancerous lesions. There are a number of methods used to screen for cervical cancer precursors.

PAP Tests

The frequently used Pap test has good specificity but relatively poor sensitivity.

The Pap test has been successful in decreasing cervical cancer death rates in industrialized countries. Pap tests, however, are not effective in low resource or developing health economies due to the lack of infrastructure and lack of highly trained personnel to read the smear, and do not detect all pre-cancerous lesions.

Pap tests are also labour intensive, complex and tedious. It is not effective in low-resource or developing health economies due to the lack of infrastructure and the highly trained personnel required to read the smear, as well as delays in reporting results, particularly in remote locations.

Visual Inspection

Visual inspection methods are often used in low-resource settings as they are inexpensive and provide an immediate result. However, they are relatively non-specific and have low sensitivity.

Liquid-based cytology

Liquid-based cytology (e.g. ThinPrep) is a variation on the conventional Pap test. Recent research has shown that liquid-based cytology does not show any advantage over conventional Pap tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity.


There is a strong association between persistent infection with high-risk oncogenic types of HPV, the development of cervical cancer precursor lesions and the subsequent development of cervical cancer. Therefore, development of cervical cancer is associated with persistent infection with oncogenic types of HPV.

Testing for HPV DNA may be useful in the triage of low-grade cervical changes, follow-up of non-confirmed, possible high-grade changes, post-colposcopy follow-up of CIN 2-3 and clarifying indeterminate histology.

Although HPV DNA testing started to be approved for screening in developed countries, it is a quite expensive process that won’t be afordable for population based screening in developing countries. Furthermore, like PAP and Liquid Based Cytology, HPV tests need an infrastructure of laboratory facilities which are lacking in developing countries.


Although vaccines are effective in prevention of persistent HPV infection, it is essential that women continue to undergo cervical cancer screening because:

  • The two HPV vaccines available on the market only cover the types of HPV that cause 70%  of cervical cancer cases.
  • Vaccines are only effective for women who have not had sexual contact. Guidelines in many countries do not vaccinate women over 13 years of age.
  • The duration of the effectiveness of vaccines is unknown.
  • The opportunistic rise in prevalence of previously low incident oncogenic HPV types cannot be predicted.